# Check for stdbool.h that conforms to C99.
-# Copyright (C) 2002-2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-
-# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
-# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
-# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option)
-# any later version.
-
-# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
-# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
-# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
-# GNU General Public License for more details.
-
-# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
-# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
-# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA
-# 02111-1307, USA.
+dnl Copyright (C) 2002-2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+dnl This file is free software; the Free Software Foundation
+dnl gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
+dnl with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
# Prepare for substituting <stdbool.h> if it is not supported.
AC_SUBST([HAVE__BOOL])
])
+# AM_STDBOOL_H will be renamed to gl_STDBOOL_H in the future.
+AC_DEFUN([gl_STDBOOL_H], [AM_STDBOOL_H])
+
# This macro is only needed in autoconf <= 2.59. Newer versions of autoconf
# have this macro built-in.
char a[true == 1 ? 1 : -1];
char b[false == 0 ? 1 : -1];
char c[__bool_true_false_are_defined == 1 ? 1 : -1];
- char d[(bool) -0.5 == true ? 1 : -1];
+ char d[(bool) 0.5 == true ? 1 : -1];
bool e = &s;
- char f[(_Bool) -0.0 == false ? 1 : -1];
+ char f[(_Bool) 0.0 == false ? 1 : -1];
char g[true];
char h[sizeof (_Bool)];
char i[sizeof s.t];
enum { j = false, k = true, l = false * true, m = true * 256 };
_Bool n[m];
char o[sizeof n == m * sizeof n[0] ? 1 : -1];
+ char p[-1 - (_Bool) 0 < 0 && -1 - (bool) 0 < 0 ? 1 : -1];
+ #if defined __xlc__ || defined __GNUC__
+ /* Catch a bug in IBM AIX xlc compiler version 6.0.0.0
+ reported by James Lemley on 2005-10-05; see
+ http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-10/msg00086.html
+ This test is not quite right, since xlc is allowed to
+ reject this program, as the initializer for xlcbug is
+ not one of the forms that C requires support for.
+ However, doing the test right would require a run-time
+ test, and that would make cross-compilation harder.
+ Let us hope that IBM fixes the xlc bug, and also adds
+ support for this kind of constant expression. In the
+ meantime, this test will reject xlc, which is OK, since
+ our stdbool.h substitute should suffice. We also test
+ this with GCC, where it should work, to detect more
+ quickly whether someone messes up the test in the
+ future. */
+ char digs[] = "0123456789";
+ int xlcbug = 1 / (&(digs + 5)[-2 + (bool) 1] == &digs[4] ? 1 : -1);
+ #endif
+ /* Catch a bug in an HP-UX C compiler. See
+ http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg02303.html
+ http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-11/msg00161.html
+ */
+ _Bool q = true;
+ _Bool *pq = &q;
],
[
- return (!a + !b + !c + !d + !e + !f + !g + !h + !i + !j + !k + !l
- + !m + !n + !o);
+ *pq |= q;
+ *pq |= ! q;
+ /* Refer to every declared value, to avoid compiler optimizations. */
+ return (!a + !b + !c + !d + !e + !f + !g + !h + !i + !!j + !k + !!l
+ + !m + !n + !o + !p + !q + !pq);
],
[ac_cv_header_stdbool_h=yes],
[ac_cv_header_stdbool_h=no])])