-speed, the best language to use is C. Using another language is like
-using a non-standard feature: it will cause trouble for users. Even if
-GCC supports the other language, users may find it inconvenient to have
-to install the compiler for that other language in order to build your
-program. For example, if you write your program in C++, people will
-have to install the GNU C++ compiler in order to compile your program.
-
-C has one other advantage over C++ and other compiled languages: more
-people know C, so more people will find it easy to read and modify the
-program if it is written in C.
-
-So in general it is much better to use C, rather than the
-comparable alternatives.
-
-But there are two exceptions to that conclusion:
-
-@itemize @bullet
-@item
-It is no problem to use another language to write a tool specifically
-intended for use with that language. That is because the only people
-who want to build the tool will be those who have installed the other
-language anyway.
-
-@item
-If an application is of interest only to a narrow part of the community,
-then the question of which language it is written in has less effect on
-other people, so you may as well please yourself.
-@end itemize
+speed, the best language to use is C. C++ is ok too, but please don't
+make heavy use of templates. So is Java, if you compile it.
+
+When highest efficiency is not required, other languages commonly used
+in the free software community, such as Scheme, Python, Ruby, and
+Java, are OK too. Scheme, as implemented by GNU@tie{}Guile, plays a
+particular role in the GNU System: it is the preferred language to
+extend programs written in C/C++, and also a fine language for a wide
+range of applications. The more GNU components use Guile and Scheme,
+the more users are able to extend and combine them (@pxref{The Emacs
+Thesis,,, guile, GNU Guile Reference Manual}).