@setfilename standards.info
@settitle GNU Coding Standards
@c This date is automagically updated when you save this file:
-@set lastupdate August 19, 2006
+@set lastupdate January 21, 2007
@c %**end of header
@dircategory GNU organization
@copying
The GNU coding standards, last updated @value{lastupdate}.
-Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000,
-2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+Copyright @copyright{} 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,
+2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 Free Software
+Foundation, Inc.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2
For example, Unix utilities were generally optimized to minimize
memory use; if you go for speed instead, your program will be very
-different. You could keep the entire input file in core and scan it
+different. You could keep the entire input file in memory and scan it
there instead of using stdio. Use a smarter algorithm discovered more
recently than the Unix program. Eliminate use of temporary files. Do
it in one pass instead of two (we did this in the assembler).
If a program typically uses just a few meg of memory, don't bother making any
effort to reduce memory usage. For example, if it is impractical for
other reasons to operate on files more than a few meg long, it is
-reasonable to read entire input files into core to operate on them.
+reasonable to read entire input files into memory to operate on them.
However, for programs such as @code{cat} or @code{tail}, that can
usefully operate on very large files, it is important to avoid using a
If a program works by lines and could be applied to arbitrary
user-supplied input files, it should keep only a line in memory, because
this is not very hard and users will want to be able to operate on input
-files that are bigger than will fit in core all at once.
+files that are bigger than will fit in memory all at once.
If your program creates complicated data structures, just make them in
-core and give a fatal error if @code{malloc} returns zero.
+memory and give a fatal error if @code{malloc} returns zero.
@node File Usage
@section File Usage
@cindex open brace
@cindex braces, in C source
It is important to put the open-brace that starts the body of a C
-function in column one, and avoid putting any other open-brace or
-open-parenthesis or open-bracket in column one. Several tools look
-for open-braces in column one to find the beginnings of C functions.
-These tools will not work on code not formatted that way.
+function in column one, so that they will start a defun. Several
+tools look for open-braces in column one to find the beginnings of C
+functions. These tools will not work on code not formatted that way.
+
+Avoid putting open-brace, open-parenthesis or open-bracket in column
+one when they are inside a function, so that they won't start a defun.
+The open-brace that starts a @code{struct} body can go in column one
+if you find it useful to treat that definition as a defun.
It is also important for function definitions to start the name of the
function in column one. This helps people to search for function
same declaration. Instead, declare the structure tag separately
and then use it to declare the variables or typedefs.
-Try to avoid assignments inside @code{if}-conditions. For example,
-don't write this:
+Try to avoid assignments inside @code{if}-conditions (assignments
+inside @code{while}-conditions are ok). For example, don't write
+this:
@example
if ((foo = (char *) malloc (sizeof *foo)) == 0)
@example
int c;
@dots{}
-while ((c = getchar()) != EOF)
- write(file_descriptor, &c, 1);
+while ((c = getchar ()) != EOF)
+ write (file_descriptor, &c, 1);
+@end example
+
+@noindent Instead, use @code{unsigned char} as follows. (The @code{unsigned}
+is for portability to unusual systems where @code{char} is signed and
+where there is integer overflow checking.)
+
+@example
+int c;
+while ((c = getchar ()) != EOF)
+ @{
+ unsigned char u = c;
+ write (file_descriptor, &u, 1);
+ @}
@end example
It used to be ok to not worry about the difference between pointers
Sometimes a program is free software in itself but depends on a
non-free platform in order to run. For instance, many Java programs
-depend on Sun's Java implementation, and won't run on the GNU Java
-Compiler (which does not yet have all the features) or won't run with
-the GNU Java libraries. To recommend that program is inherently to
-recommend the non-free platform as well; if you should not do the
-latter, then don't do the former.
+depend on the parts of Sun's Java implementation which are not yet
+freely available, and won't run on the GNU Java Compiler (which does
+not yet have all the features) or won't run with the GNU Java
+libraries. We hope this particular problem will be gone in a few
+months, when Sun makes the standard Java libraries freely available,
+but of course the general principle remains: you should not recommend
+programs that depend on non-free software to run.
+
+Some free programs encourage the use of non-free software. A typical
+example is @command{mplayer}. It is free software in itself, and the
+free code can handle some kinds of files. However, @command{mplayer}
+recommends use of non-free codecs for other kinds of files, and users
+that install @command{mplayer} are very likely to install those codecs
+along with it. To recommend @command{mplayer} is, in effect, to
+recommend the non-free codecs. We must not do that, so we cannot
+recommend @command{mplayer} either.
+
+In general, you should also not recommend programs that themselves
+strongly recommend the use of non-free software.
A GNU package should not refer the user to any non-free documentation
for free software. Free documentation that can be included in free
By contrast, it is ok to refer to journal articles and textbooks in
the comments of a program for explanation of how it functions, even
though they be non-free. This is because we don't include such things
-in the GNU system even if we are allowed to--they are outside the
+in the GNU system even if we are allowed to---they are outside the
scope of an operating system project.
Referring to a web site that describes or recommends a non-free
projects / gnulib.git / blobdiff