/* Test of command line argument processing.
- Copyright (C) 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+ Copyright (C) 2009-2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
/* The glibc/gnulib implementation of getopt supports setting optind =
0, but not all other implementations do. This matters for getopt.
But for getopt_long, we require GNU compatibility. */
-#if defined __GETOPT_PREFIX || (__GLIBC__ >= 2)
+#if defined __GETOPT_PREFIX || (__GLIBC__ >= 2 && !defined __UCLIBC__)
# define OPTIND_MIN 0
#elif HAVE_DECL_OPTRESET
# define OPTIND_MIN (optreset = 1)
ASSERT (optind == 3);
ASSERT (!output);
}
-#endif
+#endif /* GNULIB_TEST_GETOPT_GNU */
/* Check that invalid options are recognized; and that both opterr
and leading ':' can silence output. */
ASSERT (optind == 12);
}
}
-#endif
/* Check that the '-' flag has to come first. */
for (start = OPTIND_MIN; start <= 1; start++)
argv[argc++] = "-+";
argv[argc] = NULL;
optind = start;
- /* Suppress output, since glibc is inconsistent on whether this
- prints a message:
- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11039 */
- opterr = 0;
getopt_loop (argc, argv, "+abp:q:",
&a_seen, &b_seen, &p_value, &q_value,
&non_options_count, non_options, &unrecognized, &output);
ASSERT (non_options_count == 0);
ASSERT (unrecognized == '+');
ASSERT (optind == 2);
- ASSERT (!output);
+ ASSERT (output);
}
/* Check that '--' ends the argument processing. */
ASSERT (q_value == NULL);
ASSERT (non_options_count == 0);
ASSERT (unrecognized == 0);
- ASSERT (optind = 1);
+ ASSERT (optind == 1);
ASSERT (!output);
}
+#endif /* GNULIB_TEST_GETOPT_GNU */
/* Check that the '+' flag has to come first. */
for (start = OPTIND_MIN; start <= 1; start++)
}
}
- /* No tests of "-:..." or "+:...", due to glibc bug:
- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11039 */
+#if GNULIB_TEST_GETOPT_GNU
+ /* If GNU extensions are supported, require compliance with POSIX
+ interpretation on leading '+' behavior.
+ http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=191 */
+ for (start = OPTIND_MIN; start <= 1; start++)
+ {
+ int a_seen = 0;
+ int b_seen = 0;
+ const char *p_value = NULL;
+ const char *q_value = NULL;
+ int non_options_count = 0;
+ const char *non_options[10];
+ int unrecognized = 0;
+ bool output;
+ int argc = 0;
+ const char *argv[10];
+
+ argv[argc++] = "program";
+ argv[argc++] = "donald";
+ argv[argc++] = "-p";
+ argv[argc++] = "billy";
+ argv[argc++] = "duck";
+ argv[argc++] = "-a";
+ argv[argc++] = "bar";
+ argv[argc] = NULL;
+ optind = start;
+ opterr = 1;
+ getopt_loop (argc, argv, "+:abp:q:",
+ &a_seen, &b_seen, &p_value, &q_value,
+ &non_options_count, non_options, &unrecognized, &output);
+ ASSERT (strcmp (argv[0], "program") == 0);
+ ASSERT (strcmp (argv[1], "donald") == 0);
+ ASSERT (strcmp (argv[2], "-p") == 0);
+ ASSERT (strcmp (argv[3], "billy") == 0);
+ ASSERT (strcmp (argv[4], "duck") == 0);
+ ASSERT (strcmp (argv[5], "-a") == 0);
+ ASSERT (strcmp (argv[6], "bar") == 0);
+ ASSERT (argv[7] == NULL);
+ ASSERT (a_seen == 0);
+ ASSERT (b_seen == 0);
+ ASSERT (p_value == NULL);
+ ASSERT (q_value == NULL);
+ ASSERT (non_options_count == 0);
+ ASSERT (unrecognized == 0);
+ ASSERT (optind == 1);
+ ASSERT (!output);
+ }
+ for (start = OPTIND_MIN; start <= 1; start++)
+ {
+ int a_seen = 0;
+ int b_seen = 0;
+ const char *p_value = NULL;
+ const char *q_value = NULL;
+ int non_options_count = 0;
+ const char *non_options[10];
+ int unrecognized = 0;
+ bool output;
+ int argc = 0;
+ const char *argv[10];
+
+ argv[argc++] = "program";
+ argv[argc++] = "-p";
+ argv[argc] = NULL;
+ optind = start;
+ getopt_loop (argc, argv, "+:abp:q:",
+ &a_seen, &b_seen, &p_value, &q_value,
+ &non_options_count, non_options, &unrecognized, &output);
+ ASSERT (a_seen == 0);
+ ASSERT (b_seen == 0);
+ ASSERT (p_value == NULL);
+ ASSERT (q_value == NULL);
+ ASSERT (non_options_count == 0);
+ ASSERT (unrecognized == 'p');
+ ASSERT (optind == 2);
+ ASSERT (!output);
+ }
+ for (start = OPTIND_MIN; start <= 1; start++)
+ {
+ int a_seen = 0;
+ int b_seen = 0;
+ const char *p_value = NULL;
+ const char *q_value = NULL;
+ int non_options_count = 0;
+ const char *non_options[10];
+ int unrecognized = 0;
+ bool output;
+ int argc = 0;
+ const char *argv[10];
+
+ argv[argc++] = "program";
+ argv[argc++] = "-b";
+ argv[argc++] = "-p";
+ argv[argc] = NULL;
+ optind = start;
+ getopt_loop (argc, argv, "+:abp:q:",
+ &a_seen, &b_seen, &p_value, &q_value,
+ &non_options_count, non_options, &unrecognized, &output);
+ ASSERT (a_seen == 0);
+ ASSERT (b_seen == 1);
+ ASSERT (p_value == NULL);
+ ASSERT (q_value == NULL);
+ ASSERT (non_options_count == 0);
+ ASSERT (unrecognized == 'p');
+ ASSERT (optind == 3);
+ ASSERT (!output);
+ }
+
+ /* Check that 'W' does not dump core:
+ http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12922
+ Technically, POSIX says the presence of ';' in the opt-string
+ gives unspecified behavior, so we only test this when GNU compliance
+ is desired. */
+ for (start = OPTIND_MIN; start <= 1; start++)
+ {
+ int argc = 0;
+ const char *argv[10];
+ int pos = ftell (stderr);
+
+ argv[argc++] = "program";
+ argv[argc++] = "-W";
+ argv[argc++] = "dummy";
+ argv[argc] = NULL;
+ optind = start;
+ opterr = 1;
+ ASSERT (getopt (argc, (char **) argv, "W;") == 'W');
+ ASSERT (ftell (stderr) == pos);
+ ASSERT (optind == 2);
+ }
+#endif /* GNULIB_TEST_GETOPT_GNU */
}