X-Git-Url: http://erislabs.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lib%2Fstdbool_.h;h=e33715a615029e64ae6b705db8b841976c9aaa71;hb=8912e6d4dccc2f3b7d125229ef9ee05dda1f36ed;hp=0334cd9fcffe5603bca1673b2663dc410aa98a2b;hpb=a7960f5680ae1cf5a5be56bd80c0a748ce4a937e;p=gnulib.git diff --git a/lib/stdbool_.h b/lib/stdbool_.h index 0334cd9fc..e33715a61 100644 --- a/lib/stdbool_.h +++ b/lib/stdbool_.h @@ -20,23 +20,65 @@ /* ISO C 99 for platforms that lack it. */ +/* Usage suggestions: + + Programs that use should be aware of some limitations + and standards compliance issues. + + Standards compliance: + + - must be #included before 'bool', 'false', 'true' + can be used. + + - You cannot assume that sizeof (bool) == 1. + + - Programs should not undefine the macros bool, true, and false, + as C99 lists that as an "obsolescent feature". + + Limitations of this substitute, when used in a C89 environment: + + - must be #included before the '_Bool' type can be used. + + - You cannot assume that _Bool is a typedef; it might be a macro. + + - In C99, casts and automatic conversions to '_Bool' or 'bool' are + performed in such a way that every nonzero value gets converted + to 'true', and zero gets converted to 'false'. This doesn't work + with this substitute. With this substitute, only the values 0 and 1 + give the expected result when converted to _Bool' or 'bool'. + + Also, it is suggested that programs use 'bool' rather than '_Bool'; + this isn't required, but 'bool' is more common. */ + + /* 7.16. Boolean type and values */ /* BeOS already #defines false 0, true 1. We use the same definitions below, but temporarily we have to #undef them. */ #ifdef __BEOS__ +# include /* defines bool but not _Bool */ # undef false # undef true #endif -/* For the sake of symbolic names in gdb, define true and false as - enum constants. However, do not define _Bool as the enum type, - since the enum type might be compatible with unsigned int, whereas - _Bool must promote to int. */ -#ifndef __cplusplus +/* For the sake of symbolic names in gdb, we define true and false as + enum constants, not only as macros. + It is tempting to write + typedef enum { false = 0, true = 1 } _Bool; + so that gdb prints values of type 'bool' symbolically. But if we do + this, values of type '_Bool' may promote to 'int' or 'unsigned int' + (see ISO C 99 6.7.2.2.(4)); however, '_Bool' must promote to 'int' + (see ISO C 99 6.3.1.1.(2)). So we add a negative value to the + enum; this ensures that '_Bool' promotes to 'int'. */ +#if !(defined __cplusplus || defined __BEOS__) # if !@HAVE__BOOL@ +# if defined __SUNPRO_C && (__SUNPRO_C < 0x550 || __STDC__ == 1) + /* Avoid stupid "warning: _Bool is a keyword in ISO C99". */ +# define _Bool signed char enum { false = 0, true = 1 }; -typedef signed char _Bool; +# else +typedef enum { _Bool_must_promote_to_int = -1, false = 0, true = 1 } _Bool; +# endif # endif #else typedef bool _Bool;